The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is an international
agreement between Canada and the United States. The agreement addresses water
quality issues in the Great Lakes and the international section of the St.
Lawrence River. It’s overall goal is to uphold and re-establish the physical,
chemical, and biological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem through
interventions that are appointed at the areas of concern.
First signed by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and President
Richard Nixon in 1972, the agreement has been updated several times; in 1978,
1987, and 2012. The original 1972
agreement primarily focused on reducing algae, and both countries believed that
limiting phosphorus inputs was the answer to the control of the excessive algal
growth. The 1978 revision focused on
toxic substances in the Great Lakes, so both countries have taken action in
decreasing the release of toxic chemicals in the environment. In the 1987
revision, the United States and Canada agreed to find the specific damages,
like fish and wildlife consumption limitations, beach closings, or unfavorable
algae. This revision also concentrated on re-establishing the ecosystem within
these areas. The most recent revision in 2012 came into power February 12,
2013. This revision allowed the International Joint Commission substantial
responsibilities to inform the public and measure its progress. Also, the 2012
GLWQA now involves measures to avoid environmental risks before they result in
ecological destruction, while also continuing to support the work on current
pressures to the quality of the waters of the Great Lakes. Overall, one of the
most important changes in the 2012 GLWQA is the position both the United States
and Canada have placed on providing the widest variety of organizations,
governments and also involving the public in work to protect and restore the
water quality of the Great Lakes.
The GLWQA contains the regulations and committee that has
the power to choose whether a specific area should be labeled an area of concern.
Since each individual waterway has its own characteristics that effect its
ecological damage, a Remedial Action Plan has been created to help recognize
the causes of those damages. This, in turn, will then be used to help local
actions restore the individual waterways.
A group that is greatly involved in the Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement is the International Joint Commission. The IJC’s position
under the GLWQA is to report on development towards meeting the agreement’s
intentions, evaluate the efficiency of programs in the United States and Canada,
and lastly to examine the material given by the governments. When the GLWQA was
first created, a Water Quality Board was developed to advise the IJC. There is
also a regional office in the Great Lakes basin, managed by the IJC, to help
the IJC with its obligations under the agreement.
The IJC adopted four important priority areas in 2012 to be
worked on from 2012-2015. Each priority was given a desired goal that should
result from its work by 2015, along with a staff administration team to work
with its Great Lakes boards and many other professionals. The four main
priorities consist of: The reduction of phosphorus loads and algal blooms in
Lake Erie, the evaluation of growth towards the re-establishment of the Great
Lakes, strengthening the volume to distribute Great Lakes Science and
Information, and lastly public involvement and education.
Sources:
http://www.ijc.org/en_/Great_Lakes_Quality
https://www.ec.gc.ca/grandslacs-greatlakes/default.asp?lang=En&n=647DC488-1
http://binational.net/glwqa-aqegl/

Pollution in Lake Michigan as we know is home to millions of people, plants and animals. The water quality agreement is definitely a step in the right direction when it comes to protection. That's why I think that public involvement is so important because they can play a major role in influencing government officials and organizations. I think you did a great job outlining the IJC and how the commission works. I did not know that the Water Quality Board advises them! Overall, this is all positive information for the international Great Lakes community. In order to eventually achieve 0% pollution in the lakes, there is going to have to be some organizations that oversee the effectiveness and efficiency of these activities.
ReplyDeleteScratch the first 2 words "Pollution in" oops!
ReplyDelete