The Environmental Protection Agency and the Freshwater
Society both deal with water pollution in the Great Lakes, however in their own
different ways. Since the Environmental Protection Agency is an agency of the
U.S. federal government, they may have more options when it comes to proposing
solutions. The Freshwater Society is a non-profit organization and may not have
as many options to solutions since it is not as large as the EPA and has a lot
of volunteers that work on smaller projects rather than more bigger, complicated
projects. Even though the Freshwater Society does work on smaller projects,
they still are making an effort to work together and educate people to protect
and conserve our fresh water resources.
The Freshwater Society focuses on educating the public on
the importance of our freshwater and things they can do to help with the many
problems. This non-profit organization deals with many other volunteer
organizations, so a strength they have is having the public get more involved.
One of the eight hypotheses that have to do with this society is the Governance requires political vision. Since
a lot of these organizations are based locally, they have individual goals for
each place. “In order to steer, a society needs to have goals. While
participation is costly, and requires decision-makers to loosen their grip on
power to order to allow the public to meaningfully affect a decision, it has a
critical role to play in generating a shared vision concerning the direction
society should be steered in.”
Overall, the eight hypotheses apply to many issues when it comes to pollution of the Great Lakes. Since the Freshwater Society has so many volunteer programs, the public is more aware of pollution issues around them. The only weakness with the Freshwater Society is that they can only do so much, unless it grows and receives more funds. The EPA has many projects going on, and one of the main problems with this is funding a lot of them. However, by organizations working together, solutions to these issues regarding water pollution can be resolved over time.
Sources:
http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa
Evans, J.P. Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge, 2012. Print.

You did a nice job in clearly pointing out the strengths of your actors. NGOs like the one you have discussed do play a big role for the local public especially since there has been an increase in the numbers of NGOs. Although, at the very end you state the biggest weakness of NGOs, their lack of funding. Clarifying their strategies and diversifying where they receive their funds can help NGOS achieve their goals and make a difference. Improving internal issues such as management and budgeting to external issues like relationships with government sectors and their local communities can certainly be workable solutions dealing with water pollution or any other environmental problems.
ReplyDelete